2408-9346Research result. Business and Service Technologies2408-934610.18413/2408-9346-2018-4-3-0-11524The development of the tourist industryResults of the estimation of aesthetic and consumer parameters of the landscape and recreational nature use in the territory of Rakitnoye district of the Belgorod regionResults of the estimation of aesthetic and consumer parameters of the landscape and recreational nature use in the territory of Rakitnoye district of the Belgorod regionLopinaElena MikhailovnaLopinaElena MikhailovnaLopina@bsu.edu.ruVasilchenkoAlesya PetrovnaVasilchenkoAlesya Petrovnavasilchenko@bsu.edu.ruKornilovAndrey GennadievichKornilovAndrey GennadievichKornilov@bsu.edu.ru20184300

The article deals with the methodological foundations of the study of the aesthetic properties of the landscape. The authors present a method for assessing the aesthetic and consumer environmental parameters and recreational environmental management. The methodology is based on a geoecological approach, which allows considering the problem in the spatio-temporal aspects of the interaction of society and the environment, taking into account geographic, social, cultural, and economic aspects at the level of the geo-ecosystem. The results of testing the methodology in the territory of Rakitnoye district of the Belgorod region are presented. In the course of the work, the complex geographical characteristics of the municipal area were compiled. The qualitative and quantitative differences in the perception of the environment and environmental management parameters in different settlements were revealed. Landscape preferences of residents of various settlements in three spatial-temporal forms, degree of satisfaction with the environment, indicators of attractiveness of elements of the natural environment were studied, and the coefficients of activity and mobility of recreational nature management were calculated. The indicators vary in accordance with the size of settlements, their population, and the diversity of the surrounding nature.

The article deals with the methodological foundations of the study of the aesthetic properties of the landscape. The authors present a method for assessing the aesthetic and consumer environmental parameters and recreational environmental management. The methodology is based on a geoecological approach, which allows considering the problem in the spatio-temporal aspects of the interaction of society and the environment, taking into account geographic, social, cultural, and economic aspects at the level of the geo-ecosystem. The results of testing the methodology in the territory of Rakitnoye district of the Belgorod region are presented. In the course of the work, the complex geographical characteristics of the municipal area were compiled. The qualitative and quantitative differences in the perception of the environment and environmental management parameters in different settlements were revealed. Landscape preferences of residents of various settlements in three spatial-temporal forms, degree of satisfaction with the environment, indicators of attractiveness of elements of the natural environment were studied, and the coefficients of activity and mobility of recreational nature management were calculated. The indicators vary in accordance with the size of settlements, their population, and the diversity of the surrounding nature.

aesthetics of landscapesaesthetic-consumer parameters of the environmentrecreational nature managementaesthetics of landscapesaesthetic-consumer parameters of the environmentrecreational nature managementСписок литературы1. Vasilchenko, A. P., Lopina, E. M. (2017), Conceptual approaches to the assessment of aesthetic and consumer parameters of the landscape / In the book: Problems of nature management and the ecological situation in European Russia and in adjacent territories // Proceedings of the VII International. scientific conf. (in memory of prof. Petin A.N.). Belgorod, Polyterra. 37-40.[in Russian].2. Vedenin, Yu. A. (2003), Informational basis for the study and formation of the cultural landscape as a heritage site / Izv. An. Ser. Geogr,3. 7-13. [in Russian].3. Ilivanova, I.V., Kornilov, A. G. (2004), Geo-ecosystem of the Chuvash Republic / Bulletinof the Chuvash University, 2. 83-95. [in Russian].4. Kornilov, A. G. Fedutenko, A. P, Lopina, E. M. (2010), Evaluation of aesthetic and consumer parameters of the landscape in the context of modern land use (using urban settlements of the Belgorod region as an example) / Scientific News of BelSU. Series of Natural Sciences, 21 (92). 168‒173. [in Russian].5. Kochurov, B. I., Buchatskaya, N. V. (2007), Evaluation of the aesthetic potential of landscapes / South of Russia: ecology, development, 25-34. [in Russian].6. Kuskov, A. S., Golubeva, V. L., Odintsova, T. N. (2005), Recreational geography:educational and methodical complex. M., MPSI, Flint. – 496 p. [in Russian].7. Lopina, E. M., Kornilov, A. G. (2005), Evaluation of aesthetic and consumer environmental parameters / Tutorial. Belgorod, BelgorodState Enterprise, BelSU National Research University, 102 p. [in Russian].8. Mukhina, L. I., Vedenin, Yu. A., Danilova, N. A. (1975), Evaluation of natural conditions. In: Theoretical Foundations of RecreationalGeography. M., Science. 131‒158. [in Russian].9. Nikolaev, V. A. Landscape Science: Aesthetics and Design. M., Aspect Press, 2003. – 176 p. [in Russian].10. Oborin, M. (2010), Systemic methodology as one of the approaches to the study of recreationalenvironmental management / Vestnik UdmGU. Ser. Biology and Earth Sciences, 2. 12–  [in Russian].11. Parshevnikova, A. O. (2014), Evaluation of the aesthetic properties of residential landscapes and their impact on the psychological state of a person / Priority scientific directions: from theory to practice, 10. 2014. P. 7‒9. [in Russian].12. Rodoman, B. B. (1995), Landscape Aesthetics / In the book: The Science of Culture: Results and Prospects // Informational and analytical collection. Issue 3. M., the Russian state. Library. 1995. 4-19. [in Russian].13. Frolova, M. Yu. (1994), Evaluation of the aesthetic advantages of natural landscapes / Vestn. Mosk. un-that, Ser. 5, Geography, 24.27-33. [in Russian].14. Bunting, T. E., Gueelke, L. (1979), Behavioral and perception geography: A critical appraisal. Annals of the Association of AmericanGeographers, 69 (3): 448-462. [in English].15. Eringis, K. I., Budryunas, A. R. (1975), EHkologiya i ehstetika landshafta. Vil'nyus, Mintis, 1975. – 176. [in English].16. Kane, P. S. (1981), Assessing Landscape Attractiveness: a comparative test of tw onew method. Applied geography. 1, 77-96. [inEnglish].17. Linton, D. L. (1968), The Assesment of Scenery as a Natural Resource. Scotish Geographical Magazine. 84: 219-238. [in English].18. Lopina, E. M., Kornilov, A. G., Petin, A. N. Kireeva-Genenko, I. A. (2016), Assessment of the Consumer and Aesthetic Parameters of the Regional Level. International Business Management, 10 (16): 3364-3368.19. Rushton, G. (1979), On behavioral and perception geography. Annals, Association of American Geographers, 1979. – 69: 463-464. [inEnglish].20. Tricart, J. (1979), Paysage et ecologie. Revue de geomorphologie dynamique. 3: 30-34. [in English].