<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2408-9346</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research result. Business and Service Technologies</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2408-9346</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2408-9346-2024-10-4-0-8</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">3647</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF BUSINESS</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;Comprehensive Analysis of Project Management Methodologies:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Evaluating the Effectiveness of Hybrid Approaches and Adaptive Strategies&lt;/strong&gt;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;Comprehensive Analysis of Project Management Methodologies:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Evaluating the Effectiveness of Hybrid Approaches and Adaptive Strategies&lt;/strong&gt;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Belskii</surname><given-names>Ivan N.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Belskii</surname><given-names>Ivan N.</given-names></name></name-alternatives></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Klimova</surname><given-names>Tatiana Bronislavovna</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Klimova</surname><given-names>Tatiana Bronislavovna</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>tklimova@bsu.edu.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><institution>Belgorod State National Research University</institution></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/business/2024/4/ilovepdf_merged_1-112-121.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>This article analyzes project management methodologies, emphasizing the importance of synthesizing traditional and adaptive approaches to meet the evolving demands of the market environment. In the context of continuous technological and managerial progress, significant attention is given to flexible methodologies such as Agile, Scrum, and Kanban, which enable project teams to rapidly adapt to new circumstances and mitigate risks. However, projects with clearly defined parameters and requirements, where strict control and predictability are critical, necessitate the use of traditional management methods, such as the predictive Waterfall model. The research findings indicate that hybrid models, combining elements of both flexible and traditional approaches, can provide the necessary balance between adaptability and structure, which is particularly relevant for complex projects. The study aims to analyze existing methodologies in the field of project management and explore authors&amp;#39; perspectives on their applicability. The key findings of the research underscore the importance of integrating theoretical and practical methodologies into project activities. This approach enables project managers to adapt to changes during project implementation and apply various methodologies depending on specific conditions. This article will be of interest to both practicing professionals in project management and the academic audience studying this field.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>This article analyzes project management methodologies, emphasizing the importance of synthesizing traditional and adaptive approaches to meet the evolving demands of the market environment. In the context of continuous technological and managerial progress, significant attention is given to flexible methodologies such as Agile, Scrum, and Kanban, which enable project teams to rapidly adapt to new circumstances and mitigate risks. However, projects with clearly defined parameters and requirements, where strict control and predictability are critical, necessitate the use of traditional management methods, such as the predictive Waterfall model. The research findings indicate that hybrid models, combining elements of both flexible and traditional approaches, can provide the necessary balance between adaptability and structure, which is particularly relevant for complex projects. The study aims to analyze existing methodologies in the field of project management and explore authors&amp;#39; perspectives on their applicability. The key findings of the research underscore the importance of integrating theoretical and practical methodologies into project activities. This approach enables project managers to adapt to changes during project implementation and apply various methodologies depending on specific conditions. This article will be of interest to both practicing professionals in project management and the academic audience studying this field.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>project approach project management</kwd><kwd>Agile</kwd><kwd>Scrum</kwd><kwd>Kanban project management methodology</kwd><kwd>flexible methodologies</kwd><kwd>project management tools</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>project approach project management</kwd><kwd>Agile</kwd><kwd>Scrum</kwd><kwd>Kanban project management methodology</kwd><kwd>flexible methodologies</kwd><kwd>project management tools</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Bannikov, A. I. (2021), &amp;ldquo;Problematika upravleniya proektami kak sotsial&amp;#39;no-ekonomicheskimi sistemami&amp;rdquo;, T-Comm: Telekommunikatsii i transport, T. 15, 4, pp. 35-41.&amp;nbsp; DOI 10.36724/2072-8735-2021-15-4-35-41.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Bekmeshov, A. Yu. and Krukhmalev, E. V. (2021), &amp;ldquo;Sravnitel&amp;#39;nyy analiz, perspektivy i trendy razvitiya proektnykh metodologiy&amp;rdquo;, Kachestvo. Innovatsii. Obrazovanie, 4 (174), pp. 93-104. DOI 10.31145/1999-513x-2021-4-93-104.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Chernobay, A. V. (2024), &amp;ldquo;Genezis proektnykh metodologiy: vliyaniye filosofskikh paradigm na formirovanie podkhodov k upravleniyu proektami&amp;rdquo;, Vestnik Gosudarstvennogo universiteta prosveshcheniya. Seriya: Ekonomika, 1, pp. 18-33. DOI 10.18384/2949-5024-2024-1-18-33.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Doroshenko, N. N. (2023), &amp;ldquo;Formirovanie metodologii upravleniya proektami v usloviyakh nestabil&amp;#39;noy vneshney sredy&amp;rdquo;, Ekonomika: vchera, segodnya, zavtra, T. 13, 12-1, pp. 239-250. DOI 10.34670/AR.2024.89.65.024.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Ganina, G. E. and Klement&amp;#39;eva, S. V. (2023), &amp;ldquo;Kontseptual&amp;#39;nye osnovy vybora podkhoda k upravleniyu proektami&amp;rdquo;, Innovatsii v menedzhmente, 2 (36). pp.&amp;nbsp; 32-39.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Eliseenko, S. A. and Dementeva, I. I. (2024), &amp;ldquo;K voprosu o teoretiko-metodologicheskikh osnovakh upravleniya proektami&amp;rdquo;, Tendentsii razvitiya nauki i obrazovaniya, 108-5, pp. 62-64. DOI 10.18411/trnio-04-2024-255.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Kasyanova, T. A., Polyakova, K. P., Reshetova, V. V. and Frolova, D. A. (2023), &amp;ldquo;Upravlenie proektami: osnovnye ponyatiya i metody&amp;rdquo; Nauka i biznes: puti razvitiya, 4 (142), pp. 171-174.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Makhmadzhonov, I. K. (2023), &amp;ldquo;Nauchnye osnovy upravleniya proektami&amp;rdquo;, Vestnik Tekhnologicheskogo universiteta Tadzhikistana, 4-2 (55), pp. 94-103.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Proydakov, E. A. (2024), &amp;ldquo;Metodiki upravleniya proektami v sovremennom mire&amp;rdquo;, Modern Economy Success, 2, pp. 286-298. DOI 10.58224/2500-3747-2024-2-287-299.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Sheykhova, M. S. and Zheleznova, D. R. (2022), &amp;ldquo;Metodologii upravleniya proektami, ikh kharakternye cherty i osobennosti&amp;rdquo;, Agentstvo &amp;ldquo;Sliyaniya i Pogloshcheniya&amp;rdquo;, 3 (8), pp. 44-46.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Stefanova, N. A. and Andiryakova, O. O. (2022), &amp;ldquo;Razrabotka metodiki vybora metodologii upravleniya proektami&amp;rdquo;, Azimut nauchnykh issledovaniy: ekonomika i upravlenie, T. 11, 3 (40), pp. 5-9. DOI 10.57145/27128482_2022_11_03_01.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Sviridchuk, G. P. and Metelkina, U. P.&amp;nbsp; (2021), &amp;ldquo;K voprosu o metodologii i praktike upravleniya proektom&amp;rdquo;, Vestnik transporta, 5, pp. 38-39.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Urakova, E. A., Koldina, M. I., Kornusova, V. M. (2023), &amp;ldquo;Sushchnost&amp;#39; i kharakteristika tekhnologii proektnoy deyatel&amp;#39;nosti&amp;rdquo;, Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya, 78-2, pp. 282-284.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Ushakov, D. S. (2022), &amp;ldquo;Klassifikatsiya i opisanie sovremennykh podkhodov i metodik upravleniya proektami&amp;rdquo;, Vestnik Moskovskoy mezhdunarodnoy akademii, 2, pp. 203-209.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Zaripov, R. R. (2022), &amp;ldquo;Osobennosti metodov upravleniya realizatsiey proektov&amp;rdquo;, Vestnik Moskovskoy mezhdunarodnoy akademii, 2, pp. 106-111.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>