Improving the approach to managing measures of state support of enterprises during the implementation of industrial policy
Issues of the effectiveness of the implementation of industrial policy and measures of state support for industrial enterprises have reached the level of state strategic decisions in connection with the emergence of new external and internal challenges facing Russia today. The main problem that urgently needs to be solved is the development of mechanisms for implementing state policy in terms of the application of state support measures in the context of ongoing sanctions and political pressure. The authors of the article presented an evolutionary cross-section of the content of industrial policy, provided criteria for classifying its instruments and forms of implementation through a description of government support measures. Consideration of industrial policy from the historical and functional side at the macro- and meso- levels (specific territory and specific industry) contributed to the systematization of government support measures for industrial enterprises. The relevance of the research interest is related to the fact that with a significant number of publications in Russia and abroad concerning the issues of improving industrial policy and measures of state impact on industrial facilities, the problem of appropriate effective methodological and practical support for the management of state support measures remains unsolved. The article presents a systematization of state support measures for industrial enterprises, a critical analysis of the methodology for selecting enterprises receiving state support, an assessment of the results of the implementation of the applied system of support measures, as well as the reasons for the gap between the stated goals of industrial policy and its actual results. In this scientific article, the authors propose to improve the approach to assessing enterprises that are recipients of government support in order to ensure that their choices comply with the goals of industrial policy.
Garbuzov, A. M., Kirillova, O. Yu., Gladysheva, I. V. (2024), “Improving the approach to man-aging measures of state support of enterprises during the implementation of industrial policy”, Research Result. Business and Service Technologies, 10 (3), pp.
While nobody left any comments to this publication.
You can be first.
Akhmetov, I.R. and Karelin, I.Iu. (2015), “Mirovoy opyt realizatsii promyshlennogo potentsiala regiona” [“World experience in realizing the industrial potential of the region”], Ekonomika i upravlenie: nauchno-prakticheskiy zhurnal [Economics and management: scientific and practical journal], 6, pp. 47–52. [Online], available at: http://www.inefb.ru/images/journal_economics_and_management/2015/6-2015/Part-3_articles.pdf (Accessed 22 June 2024). (In Russ.).
Bukhvald, E.M. (2015), “Trudnye puti stanovleniya promyshlennoy politiki v Rossii” [“Difficult ways of establishing industrial policy in Russia”] Ekonomika: vchera, segodnya, zavtra. [Economics: yesterday, today, tomorrow], 1-2, pp. 10-33. (In Russ.).
Galishcheva, N.V. (2019), “Promyshlennaya politika kak draiver razvitiya ekonomiki Indii” [“Industrial policy as a driver for the development of the Indian economy”], Vestnik RUDN. Seriia: Ekonomika. [RUDN University Bulletin: economics series], 2 [Online], available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/promyshlennaya-politika-kak-drayver-razvitiya-ekonomiki-indii (Accessed 22 June 2024). (In Russ.).
Galoian, D. R., Karapetian, V. V. and Mazurenko, O. M. (2018), “Osobennosti promyshlennoy politiki Rossii v epokhu strukturnykh izmenenii” [“Features of Russian industrial policy in the era of structural changes”] Ekonomicheskaia nauka segodnia [Economics today], 7, pp. 76-83. (In Russ.).
Garbuzov, A.M. (2023), “Rezultaty antikrizisnoy finansovoy podderzhki promyshlennykh predpriiatiy g. Moskvy” [“Results of anti-crisis financial support for industrial enterprises in Moscow”], Innovatsii i investitsii. [Innovation and investment], 5 [Online], available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/rezultaty-antikrizisnoy-finansovoy-podderzhki-promyshlennyh-predpriyatiy-g-moskvy (Accessed 23 June 2024). (In Russ.).
Karpov, V. V., Miller, A. E. and Miller, M. A. (2018), “Issledovanie instrumentov gosudarstvennoy finansovoy podderzhki promyshlennykh predpriiatiy” [“The effectiveness of state support for the manufacturing industry in industrial regions of the Russian Federation”], Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriia: Ekonomika [Bulletin of Omsk University. Series: Economics.], 3 (63), pp. 195-203. – DOI 10.25513/1812-3988.2018.3.195-203. (In Russ.).
Korovin, G. B. (2021), “Rezultativnost gosudarstvennoy podderzhki obrabatyvaiushchey promyshlennosti v industrialnykh regionakh RF” [“The effectiveness of state support for the manufacturing industry in industrial regions of the Russian Federation”], Ekonomika regiona [Regional economy], Т. 17, Vol. 4, pp. 1256-1269. https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-4-15. (In Russ.).
Kuznetsov, B. and Simachev, Yu. (2014), “Evolyutsiya gosudarstvennoy promyshlennoy politiki v Rossii” [“The Evolution of the State Industrial Policy in Russia”]. Zhurnal Novoy Ekonomicheskoy Assotsiatsii [Journal of the New Economic Association], vol. 2, 22, pp. 152–178. (In Russ.).
Makeeva, S.B. (2021), “Regionalnaya promyshlennost KNR v khode realizatsii strategii vyravnivaiushchego i sbalansirovannogo prostranstvennogo razvitiya V 1950-1970-e gg” [“Regional industry of the People's Republic of China during the implementation of the strategy of equalizing and balanced spatial development in the 1950-1970s”], Vestnik KIGI RAN [Bulletin of KIGI RAS], 3 [Online], available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/regionalnaya-promyshlennost-knr-v-hode-realizatsii-strategii-vyravnivayuschego-i-sbalansirovannogo-prostranstvennogo-razvitiya-v (Accessed 22 June 2024). (In Russ.).
Manturov, D. V. (2016), “Gosudarstvennoe regulirovanie promyshlennosti v techenie 25 let. Chast' 1: promyshlennost 1990-kh gg” [“State regulation of industry for 25 years. Part 1: industry in the 1990s”], Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipalnogo upravleniya [Issues of state and municipal government], 3 [Online], available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/gosudarstvennoe-regulirovanie-promyshlennosti-v-techenie-25-let-chast-1-promyshlennost-1990-h-gg (Accessed 22 June 2024). (In Russ.).
Manturov, D. V. (2018), “O promyshlennoy politike Rossii na perspektivu 2018-2030 gg” [“On Russian industrial policy for the future 2018-2030”], Vestnik MGIMO [MGIMO Bulletin], 4 (61) [Online], available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/o-promyshlennoy-politike-rossii-na-perspektivu-2018-2030-gg (Accessed 23 June 2024).
Manturov, D. V. (2022), Teoriya i praktika razrabotki i realizatsii novoy modeli promyshlennoy politiki, diss. Dokt. Ekon. nauk [Theory and practice of developing and implementing a new model of industrial policy, Dr. econ. sci. diss.], 583 p. (In Russ.).
Minakir, P.A. (2014), “Promyshlennaya politika” [“Industrial policy”], Zhurnal Novoy Ekonomicheskoy Assotsiatsii [Journal of the New Economic Association], 2. pp. 180–185. [Online], available at: https://www.econorus.org/repec/journl/2014-22-180-185r.pdf. (Accessed 22 June 2024). (In Russ.).
Monitoring the effectiveness of business support measures, Official website of the Department of Entrepreneurship and Innovative Development of Moscow [Online], available at: https://monitoring.moscow.business/knowledge//. (In Russ.).
Starikov, E. N. and Ramenskaia, L. A. (2020), “Mezhdunarodny opyt formirovaniya i realizatsii promyshlennoy politiki” [“International experience in the formation and implementation of industrial policy”], Regionalnaya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika [Regional economics: theory and practice], T. 18, 2 (473), pp. 249-264. DOI 10.24891/re.18.2.249. (In Russ.).